<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Unwinding the Stack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestaticvoid.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestaticvoid.com</link>
	<description>Explorations in Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by Upgrading Solaris 10 to Solaris 11: things you should know &#124; Rainbow Chard</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-29820</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrading Solaris 10 to Solaris 11: things you should know &#124; Rainbow Chard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-29820</guid>
		<description>[...] Install or... installOuch. That&#8217;s a departure from pretty much every operating system I&#8217;ve ever used. It&#8217;s an indication of the scale of change from Solaris 10 to 11 that Oracle decided not to provide a simple upgrade path. I admit to being entirely ignorant of the reasons behind this decision, but it seems very odd to me. What&#8217;s more, users of Solaris 11 Express have been having all sorts of problems upgrading to the release version. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Install or&#8230; installOuch. That&#8217;s a departure from pretty much every operating system I&#8217;ve ever used. It&#8217;s an indication of the scale of change from Solaris 10 to 11 that Oracle decided not to provide a simple upgrade path. I admit to being entirely ignorant of the reasons behind this decision, but it seems very odd to me. What&#8217;s more, users of Solaris 11 Express have been having all sorts of problems upgrading to the release version. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Replacing Apache with Yaws by Yola</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2009/08/04/replacing-apache-with-yaws/comment-page-1/#comment-26121</link>
		<dc:creator>Yola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=139#comment-26121</guid>
		<description>Can i use c++ executable or libraries  with yaws?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can i use c++ executable or libraries  with yaws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by ben</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-26020</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-26020</guid>
		<description>Mr. Bongo, try root/solaris11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Bongo, try root/solaris11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by wr</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-25435</link>
		<dc:creator>wr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-25435</guid>
		<description>I use it sometimes, to convert videos for my old iriver clix2. So i was automatically tracking that page for an update. Though i still haven&#039;t tried out the latest 17.1 version. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use it sometimes, to convert videos for my old iriver clix2. So i was automatically tracking that page for an update. Though i still haven&#8217;t tried out the latest 17.1 version. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by James Lee</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-25429</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-25429</guid>
		<description>Not out of line at all.  I did have to uninstall Trac to upgrade to Solaris 11.  I honestly didn&#039;t think anyone still used iriverter, it&#039;s so old.  Anyway, the page is back up now.  Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not out of line at all.  I did have to uninstall Trac to upgrade to Solaris 11.  I honestly didn&#8217;t think anyone still used iriverter, it&#8217;s so old.  Anyway, the page is back up now.  Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by wr</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-25428</link>
		<dc:creator>wr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-25428</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m completely out of line here, but i see no other place to ask/inform, that probably you haven&#039;t yet fixed the iriverter project page (or Trac).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m completely out of line here, but i see no other place to ask/inform, that probably you haven&#8217;t yet fixed the iriverter project page (or Trac).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by Mr Bongo</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-25389</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Bongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-25389</guid>
		<description>Hey if you try to boot single user mode off the Solaris 11 11/11/11 x86 install image,  or try to choose menu option #3 for (single user mode) it prompts you for a user name for system maintenance mode.

root/no password
root/what is was under OSOL b131
jack/jack

do not work.  then it says &quot;login incorrect or user root not authorized&quot;.

The release notes say, the root user password is expired immediately after a successful install from the x86 USB image, but nothing is said about the x86 or SPARC standard versions. 

This is really disappointing, because there is not a seasoned Solaris administrator who HASN&quot;T recovered from a botched root disk by booting single user from a install CDROM and fixing it from here.

Yes my md5 checksums match the published ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey if you try to boot single user mode off the Solaris 11 11/11/11 x86 install image,  or try to choose menu option #3 for (single user mode) it prompts you for a user name for system maintenance mode.</p>
<p>root/no password<br />
root/what is was under OSOL b131<br />
jack/jack</p>
<p>do not work.  then it says &#8220;login incorrect or user root not authorized&#8221;.</p>
<p>The release notes say, the root user password is expired immediately after a successful install from the x86 USB image, but nothing is said about the x86 or SPARC standard versions. </p>
<p>This is really disappointing, because there is not a seasoned Solaris administrator who HASN&#8221;T recovered from a botched root disk by booting single user from a install CDROM and fixing it from here.</p>
<p>Yes my md5 checksums match the published ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by Shawn Walker</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-25232</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-25232</guid>
		<description>Yes, I know that, which is why /var/pkg/repo is preserved during image format upgrades and there are unit tests to verify this behaviour:

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17453

However, *no other directories* would have been preserved.

Please note that this was fixed in build 152.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know that, which is why /var/pkg/repo is preserved during image format upgrades and there are unit tests to verify this behaviour:</p>
<p><a href="http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17453" rel="nofollow">http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17453</a></p>
<p>However, *no other directories* would have been preserved.</p>
<p>Please note that this was fixed in build 152.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by James Lee</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-25230</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-25230</guid>
		<description>You know as well as anyone that /var/pkg/repo &lt;a href=&quot;http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/IMGPACKAGESYS/depot_server.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;used to be the default repository path&lt;/a&gt;.  So it should be reasonable to expect that some installations will still be using it, and other paths under /var/pkg for repositories.  Therefore, the behavior for the upgrade should have been for svc:/application/pkg/server to go into maintenance mode with a helpful message to say to move the data outside of /var/pkg instead of just &lt;strong&gt;deleting it&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know as well as anyone that /var/pkg/repo <a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/IMGPACKAGESYS/depot_server.html" rel="nofollow">used to be the default repository path</a>.  So it should be reasonable to expect that some installations will still be using it, and other paths under /var/pkg for repositories.  Therefore, the behavior for the upgrade should have been for svc:/application/pkg/server to go into maintenance mode with a helpful message to say to move the data outside of /var/pkg instead of just <strong>deleting it</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Solaris 11 Experience So Far by Shawn Walker</title>
		<link>http://thestaticvoid.com/post/2011/11/15/the-solaris-11-experience-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-25226</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaticvoid.com/?p=598#comment-25226</guid>
		<description>The /var/pkg directory is a project private interface.  You should not be surprised to see files disappear from there.  pkg(1) documents that it is private and subject to change.  Please do not store files there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The /var/pkg directory is a project private interface.  You should not be surprised to see files disappear from there.  pkg(1) documents that it is private and subject to change.  Please do not store files there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

